Get security results in 60 seconds.
No complex setup required.
Checkmarx analyzes source code for vulnerabilities. Scantient monitors deployed apps for runtime security gaps. Both are valuable for complete security.
Head-to-head comparison
| Feature | Checkmarx | Scantient |
|---|---|---|
| Scanning approach | SAST (static code analysis) | External (live app monitoring) |
| Requires code | Yes (analyzes source code) | No (URL paste only) |
| What it checks | Vulnerabilities in source code | 20+ runtime security checks |
| Setup complexity | High (IDE, CI/CD integration) | Low (2 minutes, paste URL) |
| Time to results | Minutes to hours | 60 seconds |
| False positives | High (many code patterns flagged) | Low (verified security issues only) |
| Requires SDK? | Yes | No |
| Pricing model | Enterprise (seat-based) | $399/mo team plan |
| Developer overhead | High (needs code integration) | Zero (external scan) |
When Checkmarx is better
- ✓You're analyzing source code for security flaws
- ✓You need SAST (static application security testing)
- ✓You want to catch vulnerabilities at code-review time
- ✓You're a large enterprise with dedicated security teams
- ✓You need deep code-level reporting and custom rules
- ✓You want shift-left security in CI/CD
When Scantient is better
- ✓You need quick security audits of live apps
- ✓You want zero developer overhead (external scan)
- ✓You need to check deployed app for runtime issues
- ✓You want compliance reports for auditors
- ✓You're a SMB or startup without huge security budgets
- ✓You want instant results (60 seconds) without setup
Real scenario: You want to verify app security
Checkmarx says:
- Found 42 issues in source code
- SQL injection risk in line 234
- XSS vulnerability in user input handler
- Weak cryptography in auth module
Setup: Days. Setup overhead: High (developers must integrate). Results: Code-level findings.
Scantient checks:
- ✓ Is your app actually vulnerable at runtime?
- ✓ Are secrets exposed in the deployed app?
- ✓ Missing security headers?
- ✓ Performance degradation?
Setup: 2 min. Setup overhead: Zero. Results: Deployed app security posture.
Checkmarx finds code vulnerabilities before deployment. Scantient finds runtime security gaps in live apps. Both are valuable for complete security.
The post-deploy gap
Checkmarx scans code before deployment. But what about after? Configuration issues, runtime secrets, performance degradation . these show up in production.
Scantient fills this gap with continuous post-deploy monitoring. Checkmarx + Scantient = complete security coverage.
From the Blog
Check your live app security in 60 seconds
Scantient Pro: Continuous monitoring for $399/mo. No setup. No developers. Pure results.
Start Scantient Pro trial